Readify

June 2016

The Other Black Girl

June 2016 is the date attached to an entry about Nella Rogers in a concealed dossier at Wagner Books. The note places the surveillance of Nella in her first months at the publisher, well before Hazel-May McCall joined, and turns ordinary details of her life into information assessed for possible use. Its discovery makes the date a marker of how long the monitoring had already been underway.

Date and Archival Context

Nella encounters the date while examining photographs she took of a folder hidden among magazine clippings. The folder contains wallet-sized photographs of Black women, including Kiara, Ebonee, and Camille, accompanied by cities, three-digit numbers, and handwritten notes. Nella’s own page carries entries reaching back to her first few months at Wagner Books. June 2016 therefore situates her record within an archive that predates Hazel’s arrival and the suspicions Nella had begun to form around her.

What the Entry Says

The note begins, “June 2016. NR seems smart, quirky. Has white boyfriend, Owen, which could be useful. Is from CT and proud of it.” It records Nella’s perceived intelligence and manner, identifies Owen as her boyfriend, and notes her Connecticut background. The phrase “which could be useful” shifts the entry from description to assessment: a personal relationship is treated as a potential resource. The note does not explain what use is intended, or identify its author, leaving the purpose of that appraisal unstated.

Discovery and Significance

Nella reads the entry aloud to Malaika after finding her own photograph among the files. The note changes the meaning of her suspicions: Hazel could not have initiated the record, because it reaches back to a time before Hazel worked at Wagner Books. The dossier’s other material suggests a wider and longer-running system of observation. A page on Kendra Rae Phillips, for example, contains dated notes stretching from the 1980s to the present, including a reported sighting in October 2018. Set beside those records, June 2016 marks not an isolated observation but an early point in the archive’s surveillance of Nella.

Consequences for Nella

After an earlier encounter with a printed list, Nella had begun quietly monitoring the office herself, noting who approached her desk, when they came, and what they said. Finding a record that had tracked her since her first months at Wagner makes that habit more than a response to immediate uncertainty: she is confronting an institution that has observed and classified her without her knowledge. June 2016 thus anchors the reversal at the heart of the discovery—Nella, who has been watching her colleagues for clues, learns that she has long been the subject of someone else’s watch.